![]() ![]() We call it the Gravel Gradient, and it’s our attempt to standardise the spectrum of a broad category.Aggregates are usually sand, gravel, clay, earth and bedrock. The gravel gradientĪfter a bit of back and forth, though, we’ve arrived at this. And it’s more complicated than just paved/unpaved surfaces, too. He proposes six broad variants of gravel, topping out at “MTB terrain – where you have dropper posts on gravel bikes, 650×2.2in tyres … get a MTB”.Īt times we toyed with a binary definition – 2WD- or 4WD-car-appropriate – but that didn’t seem to offer enough scope. Gravel, to James Huang, could fit into as few as three sub-categories: “From smoothest to roughest: dirt roads, then good-quality crushed gravel, then basically just rocks dropped into something that vaguely looks like a road.”ĭave Rome, on the other hand, feels this doesn’t go quite far enough. And all of those environments could feasibly fit under the umbrella of ‘gravel’. The CyclingTips team is spread across America and Australia and bits of Europe – places where we have well-made dirt roads, rugged singletrack, rocky fire-roads and pretty much everything in between. … are called the same thing, then how do we talk about the enormous spectrum of gear that we’re recommending for that thing? Sub-categories of a category But perhaps we can follow the Sami’s lead at least some of the way.īecause let’s be honest: ‘gravel’ doesn’t cut it as a catch-all term. It’d be foolish for me to suggest that we need to get that far into the weeds when talking about gravel. There’s a (possibly apocryphal) 50 Inuit words for snow, but the Sami have that licked: they have at least 180 words for snow and ice. A side-effect of this is that their language has developed a vast vocabulary of words for ‘snow’ and ‘reindeer’ – allowing them to communicate a rich spectrum of detail around these fundamental things. Their existence – and in turn, their language – is shaped by their context: harsh winters and subsistence herding. In the frosty north-western fringes of Europe, where Norway and Finland and Russia intersect, live the Sami people. In this confusing flurry of questions, perhaps the most pressing one is this: can we arrive at a common vocabulary to define what this ‘gravel’ thing is? Lessons from linguistics Is a gravel-appropriate tyre a 700×28 slick? A 700×35 semi-slick? A 650×47 knobbly?Īnd what about bikes – are your horizons opened up enough by a big-clearance road bike? If so, how big is that clearance, exactly? Are disc brakes mandatory? What does the geometry look like? Are the wheels 700c or 650b? Can the frame fit both? Is it suspended or rigid? Do you need an all-road bike, a gravel bike, an adventure bike … and what – if anything – is the difference between them? When talking gear for gravel, it’s easy to run into similar deficiencies in definition. We each know what gravel is when we see it – but the problem is that we also each see it through a different lens. Another person’s ‘gravel’ might be your ‘road cycling’. What you call ‘gravel’ might be another person’s ‘singletrack’. It exists on a kind of shifting scale, defined by where you live, what your appetite for adventure is, and the capabilities of your bike and the tyres it runs. Or, rather, there’s no such thing as a single conception of what ‘gravel’ is. So see above for the new video, and read below for the old background reading. Luckily, gravel isn’t going out of fashion, and this content is every bit as relevant as it was back then. Some 18 months later, our editor-in-chief Caley Fretz got around to recording a video about it, along with some of his suggested tyres for each of the grades of gravel. In August 2019, we proposed a way of categorising gravel – the Gravel Gradient™. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |